ARQUITETURA TRADICIONAL E BEM-ESTAR PSICOFÍSICO: UMA REVISÃO INTEGRATIVA DA LITERATURA

Raphael Patrício de Andrade Falcão; Ilanna de Brito Lyra Silva Meira Costa

doi:10.36674/mythos.v22i1.988

Autores/as

Raphael Patrício de Andrade Falcão Faculdade Internacional Cidade Viva
Ilanna de Brito Lyra Silva Meira Costa Centro Universitário de João Pessoa Unipê

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36674/mythos.v22i1.988

Palabras clave:

saúde mental, neurociência, psicologia, bem-estar, ambiente construído

Resumen

El estudio de la psicobiología ha revelado un potencial prometedor: comprender cómo el diseño arquitectónico puede atender de forma sostenible las necesidades psicológicas humanas. Estudios recientes sugieren que el cerebro humano se siente naturalmente atraído por estructuras con características tradicionales, lo que plantea preguntas intrigantes sobre qué elementos del entorno construido influyen realmente en el bienestar. Este artículo pretende explorar estos aspectos mediante una revisión bibliográfica integradora, con el objetivo de identificar los elementos arquitectónicos y urbanos clave que influyen positivamente en la salud física y mental, basándose en pruebas procedentes de campos como la neurociencia y la psicología, al tiempo que relaciona estos hallazgos con la arquitectura tradicional. Tras analizar 12 publicaciones seleccionadas, los resultados apuntan a una conexión significativa: las características estructurales a menudo asociadas con la arquitectura tradicional están directamente relacionadas con mejoras en la calidad de vida, que abarcan tanto el bienestar físico como el mental. Este hallazgo no sólo subraya la importancia de fomentar el diálogo entre la ciencia y el diseño, sino que también invita a una reflexión más amplia sobre cómo podemos configurar entornos que promuevan realmente la salud y la felicidad.

Citas

Andalib, E., Faghani, M., Heidari, M., & Tabari Khomeiran, R. (2022). Design of vestibules as transitional spaces in infection control: Necessity of working space changes to cope with communicable infections. Work (Reading, Mass.), 72(4), 1227–1238. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210216

Botton, A. D. (2008). The Architecture of Happiness (Reprint edition). Vintage.

Brielmann, A. A., Buras, N. H., Salingaros, N. A., & Taylor, R. P. (2022). What Happens in Your Brain When You Walk Down the Street? Implications of Architectural Proportions, Biophilia, and Fractal Geometry for Urban Science. Urban Science, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci6010003

Buras, N. H. (2020). CAN BEAUTY KILL GERMS?: THE IMPACT OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE ON PUBLIC HEALTH. New Design Ideas, 4(2), 119–137.

Coburn, A., Vartanian, O., & Chatterjee, A. (2017). Buildings, Beauty, and the Brain: A Neuroscience of Architectural Experience. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(9), 1521–1531. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01146

Darwin, C. (2017). The Origin of Species. General Press.

El-Zeiny, R. M. A. (2012). Biomimicry as a Problem Solving Methodology in Interior Architecture. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 502–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.054

Gainotti, G. (2012). Unconscious processing of emotions and the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia, 50(2), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.005

Gjerde, M., & Vale, B. (2022). An examination of people’s preferences for buildings and streetscapes in New Zealand. Australian Planner, 58(1-2), 36-48.

Hollander, J. B., & Sussman, A. (2020). Urban Experience and Design: Contemporary Perspectives on Improving the Public Realm. Routledge & CRC Press.

Huskinson, L. (2018). Architecture and the Mimetic Self: A Psychoanalytic Study of How Buildings Make and Break Our Lives. Routledge & CRC Press.

Karakas, T., & Yildiz, D. (2020). Exploring the influence of the built environment on human experience through a neuroscience approach: A systematic review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9(1), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.10.005

Kellert, S. R. (2015). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Island Press.

Lee, M.-H., Cheon, D.-Y., & Han, S.-H. (2020). A Technical Assessment of Comfort Performance of Hanok Using Comparative Field Surveys between Experts and Users. Sustainability, 12(24), 10315. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410315

Marohn, C. L. (2019). Strong Towns: A Bottom-Up Revolution to Rebuild American Prosperity. Wiley.

Michalos, A. C. (2014). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer.

Mouratidis, K. (2018). Rethinking how built environments influence subjective well-being: A new conceptual framework. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 11(1), 24–40.

Mouratidis, K., & Hassan, R. (2020). Contemporary versus traditional styles in architecture and public space: A virtual reality study with 360-degree videos. Cities, 97, 102499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102499

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Ramzy, N. (2015a). Sustainable Spaces with Psychological Values: Historical Architecture as Reference Book for Biomimetic Models with Biophilic Qualities. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR.

Ramzy, N. S. (2015b). Biophilic qualities of historical architecture: In quest of the timeless terminologies of “life” in architectural expression. Sustainable Cities and Society, 15, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.11.006

Rizi, R. A. (2022). Occupants’ migration in residential buildings towards comfort and energy efficiency (case of traditional residential architecture in Iran). Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 37(1), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09829-w

Salingaros, N. A. (2008). Anti-Architecture and Deconstruction (3rd ed. edição). Isi Distributed Titles.

Salingaros, N. (2024). ARCHITECTURAL KNOWLEDGE: LACKING A KNOWLEDGE SYSTEM, THE PROFESSION REJECTS HEALING ENVIRONMENTS THAT PROMOTE HEALTH AND WELL-BEING. New Design Ideas, 8(2), 261–299. https://doi.org/10.62476/ndi82261

Samalavi?ius, A. (2018). Beyond sustainability: Reconsidering the healing qualities of the built environment. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 213(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/213/1/012001

Scruton, R. (2015). Roger Scruton: “Why Beauty Matters?” (Por que a beleza importa? - Legendado) [Gravação de vídeo]. https://vimeo.com/128428182

Seresinhe, C. I., Preis, T., MacKerron, G., & Moat, H. S. (2019). Happiness is Greater in More Scenic Locations. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 4498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40854-6

Souza, M. T. de, Silva, M. D. da, & Carvalho, R. de. (2010). Revisão integrativa: O que é e como fazer. einstein (São Paulo), 8, 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082010RW1134

Sussman, A., & Hollander, J. B. (2021). Cognitive Architecture: Designing for How We Respond to the Built Environment. Routledge & CRC Press.

Wilson, E. O. (2007). Biophilia and the Conservation Ethic. Em Evolutionary Perspectives on Environmental Problems. Routledge.

Zeki, S. (2019). Beauty in Architecture: Not a Luxury - Only a Necessity. Architectural Design, 89(5), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2473

Zhong, W., Schröder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2022). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), 114–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006